Contemporary Rhetoric Week 7

Today is our second night discussing the major theorists and theories associated with postmodernity. Katherine developed a spreadsheet to help organize our discussion; let’s try to flush out more of the sheet this week:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiCj7a4lv2s2dHZhcWVvd25VN1dLcEEyaEtDUG1KWWc&usp=sharing

 

Next Weel’s Reading

Next week we will be focusing our attention on James Berlin’s Rhetoric, Poeticsand Cultures. While I would love to read the whole book, but we do not have time for that. I am more interested in Berlin’s treatment of postmodernism, especially given his influence over the discipline. So let’s read pages 1-122. 

I also want to read Victor Vitanza’s response to Berlin. Berlin and Vitanza were close friends and intellectual rivals. They went back and forth across a number of articles over the years. Berlin’s contribution to the discussion is generally re-worked in the book. Unfortunately, Berlin died suddenly before the book was even completed, and before Vitanza had a chance to respond. Victor then revised the introduction to Negation, Subjectivity, and the History of Rhetoric as a response to Berlin–imaging how a conversation between the two of them might (not) go. You’ll read that conversation this week (1-24, pdf). 

I’ll also ask that you read another piece by Vitanza, Abandoned to Writing: Notes Toward Several Provocations, in the online journal Enculturation. The essay was part of a special edition that asked contributors to theorize the meaning of relationship between Rhetoric and Composition (which Victor takes up as the meaning of the slash). 

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.