Author Archives: insignificantwrangler@gmail.com

Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children? (No, Seriously)

The other day Casey posted an interesting article on the globalization of American psychological disorders; to which I responded my interest in how contagion can be discursive: “if you word it, it will come?” I was reacting specifically to a … Continue reading

Posted in cicero, lacan, pragmatism | Comments Off on Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children? (No, Seriously)

Adrian Beltre? Seriously?

Ok, I have no idea what Theo Epstein hopes to accomplish in 2010. Because Adrian Beltre just screams “one-year-wonder-during-the-hight-of-the-steriods-era.” I know its only a one-year deal, and that the Red Sox are angling to trade for Adrian Gonzalez during this … Continue reading

Posted in baseball, redsox | Comments Off on Adrian Beltre? Seriously?

Clients from Hell

For more evidence of why an extensive education in rhetoric might be valuable in the 21st century broadcast society, please see Clients from Hell.

Posted in CSS, design, rhetoric | Comments Off on Clients from Hell

Reflections: Rickert’s Acts of Enjoyment

I thought I would share a few paragraphs from Thomas Rickert’s Acts of Enjoyment: The point, ultimately, is not that we should immediately change the pedagogical road we are on. This would risk falling into the same critical mode I … Continue reading

Posted in blogging, rhetoric, rickert, theory | Comments Off on Reflections: Rickert’s Acts of Enjoyment

Courtesy of XKCD

Posted in xkcd | Comments Off on Courtesy of XKCD

A Not-So-Sophistical Defense for Going for It

First of all, congratulations to the Colts for an amazing second-half. They played better and they won the game. And they don’t deserve the criticism that “Belichick handed them the win.” How often are coaches criticized for “coaching not to … Continue reading

Posted in football, pats, rhetoric | Comments Off on A Not-So-Sophistical Defense for Going for It

Why the New “V” Isn’t “Battlestar”

This started as an email to Casey’s question of what I thought of the new V last night. He remarked that the show had clear conservative overtones. My response: I agree on the conservative overtones- but art is meant to … Continue reading

Posted in politics, television | Comments Off on Why the New “V” Isn’t “Battlestar”

Jon Stewart on Fox News

I discovered this at the Blogora this morning, and posted it to Facebook already. But I do have a few friends, well at least one, who resist the siren song of Facebook. So here’s the video clip with my short, … Continue reading

Posted in Nietzsche, politics, rhetoric, theory | Comments Off on Jon Stewart on Fox News

Links for Talk

I’m guest lecturing in a graduate course tonight on the evolution from literacy to digitality (my playful name for the talk is “From the Ear to the Eye to the Mouth: Orality, Literacy, and Digitality”). I didn’t have time to … Continue reading

Posted in lecture-notes | Comments Off on Links for Talk

Talkin’ Shop: Teaching Direct Quotation

I’m doing a nuts-and-bolts topoi approach to direct quotation today, and I thought I would share my brief overlay. I’m also interested in how other people approach the subject. In class today we are going to focus on incorporating direct … Continue reading

Posted in teaching | Comments Off on Talkin’ Shop: Teaching Direct Quotation