Insignificant Twitterings
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Tags
- advanced-comp-class
- book-project
- coding
- college-comp
- community engagement
- Corder
- design
- eng122
- eng123
- eng201
- eng225
- eng229
- eng231
- eng301
- eng319
- eng328
- eng329
- eng420
- eng594
- ethics
- expository-writing
- InDesign
- job ads
- job report
- just one thing
- Lanham
- logos
- methodologies
- procedural rhetoric
- proposal
- questions
- research
- resumes
- rhetoric
- rhetorical-theory-class
- rhetoric and gaming
- rubric
- schroeppel
- sicart
- sources
- teaching-writing
- visual-rhetoric-class
- visual rhetoric
- williams and bizup
- writing
Insignificant Wranglings
Category Archives: levinas
Facing Myself
Casey posted a response to my post yesterday to Facebook. I ripped out a rather long reply, but Facebook is having difficulties. So (sorry Casey), I’ll just move the conversation here. Casey responded to yesterday’s post with: Santos: I’ve been … Continue reading
Some Thoughts on Lost
Before tonight’s show, I wanted to share my theory on this season: that Jack has already “missed” his opportunity. I believe the entire series now revolves around Jack saving the young Benjamin Linus, preventing him from ever joining the others. … Continue reading
Jim Corder as an Ethic for Blogging
Today I presented Jim Corder’s “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love” to my expository writing class. I believe Corder’s propositions for “writing with love” serve as particularly apt principles for approaching digital writing. Corder pushes for five core values: The … Continue reading
Posted in digital-citizenship, digital-media, jim-corder, levinas, rhetoric, theory
Comments Off on Jim Corder as an Ethic for Blogging
I not We, Me not US
As I’m finishing my Levinas chapter, I’m feeling how hard it is to apply his ethics to academic writing–at least my academic writing. I am so used to using the plural, collective pronouns: we and us, that it feels disorienting … Continue reading
Posted in diss, ethics, levinas, theory-in-practice
Comments Off on I not We, Me not US
Levinas and Weinberger
In jest, I offer my dissertation in two quotes. The other pages are just filler. Levinas on difference as the foundation of the subject: Reason makes human society possible; but a society whose members would be only reasons would vanish … Continue reading
Posted in diss, levinas, web2.0, weinberger
Comments Off on Levinas and Weinberger
Derrida on Levinas
I’ve been enjoying Derrida’s performative essay “At This Very Moment in This Work Here I Am… (He will have obligated [Il aura oblige]).” In the essay, Derrida explains that a reader can never be sure if the final clause of … Continue reading
Posted in derrida, levinas, politics. theory-in-practice
Comments Off on Derrida on Levinas
Responsibility for others
Normally I let Mrxk deal with this kind of stuff. He’s good at it. Witty. Poignant. Firm. But I guess, since he hasn’t hit this one yet, I’ll take it. So, if you’re reading this, you probably know I’m writing … Continue reading
Posted in diss, ethics, levinas, politics. theory-in-practice
Comments Off on Responsibility for others
Bit o’ Levinas
From “The Thinking of Being and the Question of the Other” in Of God Who Comes to Mind: We have asked whether the Other–who refuses identification, that is, thematization and hypostasis, but whom the philosophy of the tradition attempted to … Continue reading
Bit of Levinas
“A Dominican father, for whom I have much admiration and who knows Hebrew admirably, said one day before me: what one takes for an infinite interpretation of the letter of Scripture is simply a reading that considers the entirety of … Continue reading
Violence and Metaphysics, part 2
Some rough draft I was working through today: The best liberation from violence is a certain putting into question, which makes the search for an archia tremble. Only the thought of Being can do so, and not traditional ‘philosophy’ or … Continue reading
Posted in derrida, digital-media, diss, ethics, levinas
Comments Off on Violence and Metaphysics, part 2