ENG 201 4.M: Herrick and Rhetoric

Today’s Plan:

  • I enjoy this Herrick reading because I feel he gives a comprehensive introduction to Rhetoric as a discipline. Like Herrick, I am rather suspicious of folks who define rhetoric as persuasion–that definition is forced on rhetoric from a *logocentric* perspective that would limit its scope and influence. This is the kind of stuff we discuss in my 319 class.I’d like to split into groups; each group will be responsible for compressing a section of the Herrick down into 3-5 sentence walk away.
    1. Rhetoric and Persuasion (pg. 3-5). How does Herrick attempt to nudge our understanding of persuasion?
    2. Rhetoric is Adapted to an Audience (pg. 8-10)
    3. Rhetoric Reveals Human Motives and Rhetoric is Responsive (pg. 10-12)
    4. Rhetoric Addresses Contingent Issues (pg. 15-16)
    5. Rhetoric Tests Ideas (pg. 16-17)
    6. Rhetoric Assists Advocacy (pg. 17-19)
    7. Rhetoric Distributes Power (pg. 19-21)
    8. Rhetoric Discovers Facts and Rhetoric Shapes Knowledge (pg. 21-22)
    9. Rhetoric Builds Community (pg. 22-23)

Passages I would like to highlight: Why does studying rhetoric matter? (pg 6).

Conclusion (five themes of Herrick’s article–what are they? How can you frame each one in a single sentence?) (pg. 24-25)

2 of Herrick’s 4 primary elements/dimensions of rhetoric:

  • Argument (claim, supported by reasons/evidence. Logos)
  • Appeals (ethos, an ethical appeal, who are we? Do I want to be this person? Pathos, how do I feel? How should I feel?

Homework

Code a total of 16 jobs. Your initials should appear in the Google Sheet 16 times, whether as a submitter or a reviewer. In Wednesday’s class, we will resolve all orange entries.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.