ENG 329 8.M: IRB and Collecting Data

Today’s Plan:

  • IRB Document

Why Are We Doing This?

I fully acknowledge that ENG 329 Professional Writing and Digital Video is a rather strange course. It is born out of my desire to craft a space in the writing minor for folks to learn a technology. I consider it as much a workshop as I do a “course.”

That said, as with most of my courses, my emphasis is on thinking about transferable skills and helping to prepare you for the job market. There a bunch of jobs out there that call for videography and fundamental editing skills. But there’s also a bunch of jobs out there that deal with customer research and user testing. The Just One Thing project aims at helping you prepare for those jobs, too. We’ll continue working on the technical, cinemagraphic, and aesthetic dimensions of video while we explore some of the fundamentals of data collection.

Today we are going to approach data collection two ways. First, we are going to explore Institutional Research Board protocols for human subjects, otherwise known as IRB. I have approval from UNC to approve your research projects.

I want to pay specific attention to the policies and procedures for producing an informed consent document (pp.17-21).

Here is an IRB form from a study I conducted several years ago.

Here is a link to the IRB form I will distribute to y’all next week.

Here is the sentence I’d like you to revise: “This project involves minimal risk. Since you are being asked to post to an online community, it is possible that you will encounter rude or derogatory commentators.”

Here is the paragraph I’d like you to revise:
This study focuses on three things. First, I am investigating whether teaching viral video projects can improve civic participation. As student participants, I will ask you to shoot short persuasive videos asking people to make a small change to their daily routine. We will distribute these videos online. Second, I measuring how well we can use this video project to teach usability, how to conduct focus groups, and how to synthesize and report on user feedback. After you distribute your video, you and your classmates will sign up to test another person’s recommendation for 30 days. You will develop surveys and focus group questions to solicit user feedback. Third, I am interested in how we can develop methods for revising video. My field, Rhetoric and Composition, is still grappling with how to teach revision, a core compositional element, with something as linear and production-heavy as video.

Here is a direct link to the readability site.

The Informed Consent document requires the following paragraph:

Participation is voluntary. You may decide not to participate in this study and if you begin participation you may still decide to stop and withdraw at any time. Your decision
will be respected and will not result in loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. Having read the above and having had an opportunity to ask any questions, please sign below if you would like to participate in this research. A copy of this form will be given to you to retain for future reference. If you have any concerns about your selection or treatment as a research participant, please contact the Office of Research, Kepner Hall, University of Northern Colorado Greeley, CO 80639; 970-351-1910.

That paragraph checks in at a 13.8 grade level! Let’s enjoy the irony. Now let’s revise it.

Here is my revision:

Participation is voluntary. You may decide not to participate in this study. If you begin participation, you may decide to stop at any time. Your decision will be respected. There is no penalty for withdrawal. Please read this form carefully. Ask any questions you have. If you are willing to participate in this research, then sign this form. You will receive a copy of this form for future reference. If you have any concerns about your selection or treatment as a research participant, then please contact Sherry May, IRB Administrator, Office of Sponsored Programs, 25 Kepner Hall, University of Northern Colorado Greeley, CO 80639; 970-351-1910.

I’d like you and your teammates to copy my UNC IRB above and use it as a template to generate an informed consent document for your Just One Thing projects. Share the document with insignificantwrangler@gmail.com. Make sure anyone with the link can edit.

Homework

Here is a link to the calendar. We are meeting in the Michener recording room on Wednesday to record mock interviews. This will serve two purposes. First, we want practice recording someone who is speaking. Second, we are going to edit this audio next week, so we can play with adjusting the volume and gain in Premiere.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ENG 329 8.M: IRB and Collecting Data

ENG 225 8.M: Project 2 Research Update

Today’s Plan:

  • Calendar Update
  • Report Expectations
  • Group Check In
  • Homework

Calendar Update

Here’s what I wrote when we began the project:

You will work together in groups of 3 to analyze representations of gender, race, or sexuality in a specific genre of video games. You will develop a paper of around 2000 words and then transform the paper into a 10 minute video (similar to Sarkeesian’s). Papers will be due on March 4th. Videos will be due on March 22nd.

Here’s the update:

  • Monday, February 25th: That’s today! Report Expectations
  • Wednesday, February 27th: Work day in the lab
  • Friday, March 1st: Williams and Bizup on Characters
  • Monday, March 4th: Reports will be due in class for peer review.
  • Wednesday, March 6th: Crash Course on shooting video and recording audio
  • Friday, March 8th: What the hell is SuperBetter? Final Project 2 papers are due

The final videos will still be due on March 22nd.

Project Two Research Report Expectations

Your focus this week should be on finishing your games research. Different groups are at different stages of this process. But it has to get done.

The structure of the report will follow the standard research format:

  • Introduction
  • Methodology
    • How you developed your corpus
    • How you analyzed your corpus
  • Findings (tables are acceptable, but keep them clean)
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion

It is hard for me to predict the word count for a project like this. But I am guessing something like this:

  • Introduction: 300 words
  • Methodology: 500-800 words (depending on how complex each system is)
  • Findings: Who the hell knows
  • Discussion: Hopefully you can tell me 4 smart things about your research. Let’s say that each smart thing takes 400 words. So that’s about 1600 words.
  • Conclusion: These are tricky to write, but I am guessing around 200 words

So, altogether, that’s 2600 words. So that’s about 10 pages double-spaced.

What makes this incredibly tricky is that some of you are working alone. Some of you are writing in groups. I am a bit unsure how to negotiate this. I’m going to go group-by-group.

  • Cover Project: There’s four of you. So 1600 words for the discussion section feels right
  • Double Trouble: There’s only two of you. Let’s aim for 2-3 smart things, so somewhere around 800-1200 words in discussion section
  • Fight Club: Four people, 1600 words.
  • Rated G: There’s 6 of you. SIX. Rather than increase the number of findings, I’d rather see you develop them further. So 3-4 findings and 2000 words. When you’ve finished your data collection, do some brainstorming and figure out what you have to say. Divide into teams. Conquer.
  • The Absent Wonders: 3 people, 800-1200 words
  • The Lone Ranger. Let’s be realistic and say 600-800 words. My guess is that you can come up with two clear findings

This is a group project. There’s a lot of ways to divide and assign work. On Wednesday, I’m going to have groups develop a gantt chart that identifies the work that has to get done, when it has to get done by, and who is responsible for doing it. No worries Connor.

Homework

Analyze, analyze, analyze. Get your data done.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on ENG 225 8.M: Project 2 Research Update

ENG 201 8.M: Catching Up

Today’s Plan:

  • Memos, Final PLP Report
  • Arc Charities Group Confirmation
  • Homework

Job Memos, Final Job Report

We are nearing the completion of the project two, the Personal Learning Project. I’d like you to compose a brief report that contains the following sections:

  • Summary (800 characters)
  • Gantt Chart Review (include the gantt chart and 800 characters on how it went)
  • Deliverables (1000 characters, Provide some description, what went right and what you’d change/do next)
  • Tutorial Evaluation (800 characters)

I’ve included character counts because the goal for this assignment is concision. You have to make the prose very tight without making it feel stilted. This is harder than it sounds.

This will be a hypertext document. Include links to tutorials, social media accounts, or wordpress sites as required. Insert screenshots of deliverables as needed.

This project is due Monday, March 4th. I am concerned as to the low amount of job memos I have received. Many of you are not failing to keep up with the reading assignments. This course is designed as more of a workshop: if you simply turn in all the projects on time, then you are really likely to get an A. Last semester 10 out of 13 students got an A. This semester, only 9 out of 20 students are on that pace. Get those memo updates to me. And, for the love of pizza, turn in the fracking PLP report on time.

Arc Charities Group Confirmation

I’m waiting on materials from Amelia–I don’t have confirmation yet on the interviews for the Organizational History. And I don’t want to jump too deep into this project until next week.

But I do want to confirm team placement. I know a few people had mentioned switching teams. Here’s where we stand:

Williams and Bizup Refresher

I wanted to review the Williams and Bizup approach to sentence syntax because the next project emphasizes concision.

Homework

Obviously, work on your PLP–both the project, deliverables, memos, and report.

For next Wednesday, March 6th, read Kramer and Bernhardt (1996) “Teaching Text Design.”

Posted in teaching | Tagged | Comments Off on ENG 201 8.M: Catching Up

ENG 329 7.W: Designing Logos for Adobe Premiere

Today’s Plan:

  • Slogan ideas?
  • Branding Tools
  • Adobe Photoshop
  • Adobe Premiere

Slogan Ideas

We’ve got:

  • Core Matters
  • Work Your Core
  • Don’t Slack, Get LAC!
  • Lib Art and Prosper

If you pay attention to Youtube videos, then you’ll see that they all begin with some kind of animated logo. Our goal today is to design a few options for our LAC project.

Let’s look at some MIT videos. Let’s look at UNC’s youtube channel.

What do we need?

  • Some kind of title/splash/intro
  • Some kind of name plate

Branding Tools

Let’s examine the UNCO brand tools.

Let’s select a logo.

The .pngs are supposed to be transparent. They aren’t. Let’s erase the background.

Adobe Photoshop

We’ve got a short video.

Setting up a new file:

  • Preset: Film and Video
  • Size: HD 720p
  • Color: RGB for video
  • Background: Transparent

We are going to want to add the Greeley Font to use in Photoshop.

Homework

Put some more time into our title/logo animation. Next week we will animate our photoshop files in After Effects (or Premiere). So, for Monday, have a .psd and .png file that can serve as a video introduction.

Remember that we are watching your Just One Thing advocacy videos next Friday!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ENG 329 7.W: Designing Logos for Adobe Premiere

ENG 329 7.W: Advocacy Videos as Genre

Today’s Plan:

  • Advocacy Videos as Genre
  • Storyboard Advocacy Scripts
  • Homework

Calendar Doc

Here it is.

Advocacy Videos as Genre

For each video:

  • Opening shot
  • Music
  • Content
    • Why do this?
    • What do we do?

The videos:

Homework

Let’s generate a list of potential slogans for the Liberal Arts Core project. As I mentioned Monday, they currently have two slogans: the first is Core Matters the second is Work Your Core. We could elect to just use one of the existing slogans. But I’m curious to see if we can come up with other ideas.

For Friday, each group needs to finish the copy of your script with storyboards. Final videos will be due in class on Friday, March 1st.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , | Comments Off on ENG 329 7.W: Advocacy Videos as Genre

ENG 225 7.W: Writing Your Methodology

Today’s Plan:

  • Write Up a Methodology
  • Begin Research

Sample Methodologies

PEW Center.

Malliet, 2007, Adapting the Principles of Ludology to the Method of Video Game Content Analysis.

Write Up a Methodology

I am putting together groups in Canvas (finally). Once completed, I’ll ask each group to share their Google Doc workspace with me. That space should contain the “corpus” of games you will analyze (the work from last class, via the template I shared). Now I want you to put together a methodology section. This methodology needs to be divided into two sections: first, describe the methodology you used to determine your corpus. Second, describe how games will be analyzed.

Homework

Do some research! Decide on how much y’all can get done by Friday. Do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on ENG 225 7.W: Writing Your Methodology

ENG 201 7.W: Preliminary Project Research

Today’s Plan:

  • Determine Groups
  • Group Specific Google Docs
  • Homework

Group Specific Google Docs

I’ve put together 3 collaborative workspaces.

Homework

I know what I’d like the grant writing folks to do. Hopefully we’ll have a sense of what the rest of you can do by the end of class.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ENG 201 7.W: Preliminary Project Research

ENG 201 7.M: Community Engagement Planning

Today’s Plan:

  • Let’s Talk About File Naming
  • Community Engagement Planning
  • Formulate Questions
  • Homework: Personal Learning Project Memos

File Naming

Rhetorical strategies for Save-As.

santos-travel-refund-sp2019.

Community Engagement Planning

Let’s examine the results of the poll.

Formulate Questions

This afternoon I’m going to write Amelia. Let’s brainstorm–group by group–what we need to know.

In the lab on Wednesday, I’ll each group to do some research in preparation for our meeting on Friday. This will vary group to group.

Homework: Personal Learning Project Memos

A reminder that the first Personal Learning Project Memo was due on Friday. I’ve only got 3 of them. Email marc.santos@unco.edu following the guidelines for emails and memos in the ABO book. Please update me on your progress according to your gantt chart.

The second Personal Learning Project Memo will be due this coming Friday, Feb 22nd.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ENG 201 7.M: Community Engagement Planning

ENG 225 6.F: Forming Groups

Today’s Plan:

  • Group Formation
  • Homework

Group Formation

At the end of last class it seemed like groups were making progress. By the end of the class today, I want us to have everyone in a group with an established methodology. I’m going to use the spreadsheet as a guide to get us started.

  • Team Green
  • Team Blue
  • Team Orange
  • Team Red

I know that the groups that are in the spreadsheet reached varying degrees of consensus on Wednesday, so I want to start by sharing potential projects and reforming groups.

Project Questions

What is the research question?

Describe the methodology?

Is there “triangulation”?

Official Group Sign Ups.

Homework

I’d like each group to put together a Google Doc and share it with all team members; I’ve got a template here. Make a copy. Put together the game list.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , | Comments Off on ENG 225 6.F: Forming Groups

ENG 201 6.F: Community Engagement Planning, Corder

Today’s Plan:

  • Community Engagement Planning
  • Corder
  • Homework

Community Engagement Planning

Next Friday we will be meeting with Amelia E. Koehmstedt,
Director of Development for Arc Charities. As I shared, we’ve discussed three potential projects:

  • Families in Action grant writing project [research potential grants, draft and develop grant materials]
  • Colorado Gives [create documentation for volunteers, develop promotional materials, work with brand identity]
  • Organizational History project [conduct interviews (oral? email? video?) with past members, synthesize documents, produce paper/html/video]

I think all three projects provide ample opportunities for you to develop and demonstrate the skills we identified in the Job Research projects. I want to get a sense of your interests before we meet with Amelia next week, so please complete this quick Google Form.

Jim Corder, “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love”

My standard questions:

  • Group One: [sections 1-3]: What does Corder mean by the idea that we make narratives? Why do said narratives complicate traditional notions of argument and rhetoric?
  • Group Two: [sections 4-6]: How can we describe Rogerian method? Why is Corder skeptical that such a method can be useful to rhetoric?
  • Group Three: [section 6-7]: Looking at section 7, would your frame Corder as an optimist or pessimist? What do “we” have to learn (and who are the “we” of this section’s final paragraphs)?
  • Group Four: [Section 8]:What do we make of section 8? Why is this story here? What does it exemplify or reinforce?
  • Group Five: [Section 9]: What does it mean to be “perpetually opening and closing” (29)? How can such a position help us be better? How does it tie to the other advice offered in this section?

I have a thing for us to read.

I have a lecture.

Homework

The first update memo on your personal learning project is due on Monday. Send me an email, following the guidelines for email in ABO 164-167 (particularly the organiztional advice on Writing and Design hint fracking hint). Feel free to insert or attach any supplemental documents.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ENG 201 6.F: Community Engagement Planning, Corder